  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>TQMP</publisher>
    <journalTitle>Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology</journalTitle>
    <issn>1913-4126</issn>
    <publicationDate>2008-03-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <startPage>21</startPage>
    <endPage>34</endPage>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Eliminating Aggregation Bias in Experimental Research: 
Random Coefficient Analysis as an Alternative to Performing 
a ‘by-subjects’ and/or ‘by-items’ ANOVA</title>

    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Glenn L. Thompson</name>
        <email>GlennLThompson@gmail.com</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>




    </authors>

    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">University of Ottawa</affiliationName>




    </affiliationsList>

    <abstract language="eng">
       Experimental psychologists routinely simplify the structure of their data by computing means for each experimental condition so that the basic assumptions of regression/ANOVA are satisfied. Typically, these means represent the performance (e.g. reaction time or RT) of a participant over several items that share some target characteristic (e.g. Mean RT for high-frequency words). Regrettably, analyses based on such aggregated data are biased toward rejection of the null hypothesis, inflating Type-I error beyond the nominal level. A preferable strategy for analyzing such data is random coefficient analysis (RCA), which can be performed using a simple method proposed by Lorch and Myers (1990). An easy to use SPSS implementation of this method is presented using a concrete example. In addition, a technique for evaluating the magnitude of potential aggregation bias in a dataset is demonstrated. Finally, suggestions are offered concerning the reporting of RCA results in empirical articles.  
    </abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://www.tqmp.org/Content/vol04-1/p021/p021.pdf</fullTextUrl>

    <keywords language="eng">    
      <keyword>Statistics</keyword>

      <keyword>ANOVA</keyword>




    </keywords>
  </record>


