<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO8859-1"?>
<records>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>TQMP</publisher>
    <journalTitle>Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology</journalTitle>
    <issn>1913-4126</issn>
    <publicationDate>2008-09-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <startPage>46</startPage>
    <endPage>50</endPage>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Using the Chow Test to Analyze Regression Discontinuities</title>

    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Howard H. Lee</name>
        <email>hhl@ncsu</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>




    </authors>

    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">California State University, Northridge</affiliationName>




    </affiliationsList>

    <abstract language="eng">
       The Chow Test (Chow, 1960) is a method well known in econometrics. It was originally designed to analyze the same variables obtained in two different data sets to determine if they were similar enough to be pooled together. Regression discontinuity design is a variation of the two-group pre-test-post-test design. The usual method of data analysis for data collected using this design is multiple regression with one dummy coded variable representing the cut-off value. This article discusses the use of the Chow Test on data obtained in a regression discontinuity study.  
    </abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://www.tqmp.org/Content/vol04-2/p046/p046.pdf</fullTextUrl>

    <keywords language="eng">    
      <keyword>Statistics</keyword>

      <keyword>Regression</keyword>


      <keyword>Regression discontinuity</keyword>



    </keywords>
  </record>

  <record>
    <language>spa</language>
    <publisher>TQMP</publisher>
    <journalTitle>Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology</journalTitle>
    <issn>1913-4126</issn>
    <publicationDate>2008-09-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <startPage>51</startPage>
    <endPage>60</endPage>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="spa">Introduccción al Bootstrap: Desarrollo de un ejemplo acompañado de software de aplicación</title>

    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Rubén Ledesma</name>
        <email>rdledesma@gmail.com</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>




    </authors>

    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina</affiliationName>




    </affiliationsList>

    <abstract language="spa">
       El bootstrap es un tipo de técnica de remuestreo de datos que permite resolver problemas relacionados con la estimación de intervalos de confianza o la prueba de significación estadística. Este enfoque puede resultar de interés para los investigadores en Psicología, no solo porque es menos restrictivo que el enfoque estadístico clásico, sino también porque es más general en su formulación y más simple de comprender en lo referente al procedimiento básico que subyace al método. En lugar de fórmulas o modelos matemáticos abstractos, el bootstrap simplemente requiere un ordenador capaz de simular un proceso de muestreo aleatorio de los datos. Sin embargo, y debido quizás a la escasa difusión de la técnica, los investigadores aún no han incorporado el bootstrap al repertorio habitual de herramientas de análisis de datos. En este trabajo realizamos una presentación conceptual del bootstrap, ilustramos la técnica mediante un ejemplo y revisamos algunas opciones disponibles en materia de software estadístico. El trabajo incluye además un programa para correr el ejemplo dentro de ViSta “The Visual Statistics System”, un sistema estadístico gratuito y abierto.  
    </abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://www.tqmp.org/Content/vol04-2/p051/p051.pdf</fullTextUrl>

    <keywords language="spa">    
      <keyword>Stastitics</keyword>

      <keyword>Boostrap</keyword>




    </keywords>
  </record>

  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>TQMP</publisher>
    <journalTitle>Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology</journalTitle>
    <issn>1913-4126</issn>
    <publicationDate>2008-09-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <startPage>61</startPage>
    <endPage>64</endPage>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005)</title>

    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Richard D. Morey</name>
        <email>moreyr@missouri.edu</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>




    </authors>

    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">UUniversity of Missouri-Columbia</affiliationName>




    </affiliationsList>

    <abstract language="eng">
       Presenting confidence intervals around means is a common method of expressing uncertainty in data. Loftus and Masson (1994) describe confidence intervals for means in within-subjects designs. These confidence intervals are based on the ANOVA mean squared error.  Cousineau (2005) presents an alternative to the Loftus and Masson method, but his method produces confidence intervals that are smaller than those of Loftus and Masson. I show why this is the case and offer a simple correction that makes the expected size of Cousineau confidence intervals the same as that of Loftus and Masson confidence intervals.  
    </abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://www.tqmp.org/Content/vol04-2/p061/p061.pdf</fullTextUrl>

    <keywords language="eng">    
      <keyword>Stastitics</keyword>

      <keyword>Confidence intervals</keyword>




    </keywords>
  </record>

  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>TQMP</publisher>
    <journalTitle>Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology</journalTitle>
    <issn>1913-4126</issn>
    <publicationDate>2008-09-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <startPage>65</startPage>
    <endPage>78</endPage>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">General Linear Models: An Integrated Approach to Statistics</title>

    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Sylvain Chartier</name>
        <email>sylvain.chartier@uottawa.ca</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>

      <author>
        <name>Andrew Faulkner</name>
        <email>af@uottawa.ca</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>




    </authors>

    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">University of Ottawa</affiliationName>




    </affiliationsList>

    <abstract language="eng">
       Generally, in psychology, the various statistical analyses are taught independently from each other. As a consequence, students struggle to learn new statistical analyses, in contexts that differ from their textbooks. This paper gives a short introduction to the general linear model (GLM), in which it is showed that ANOVA (one-way, factorial, repeated measure and analysis of covariance) is simply a multiple correlation/regression analysis (MCRA). Generalizations to other cases, such as multivariate and nonlinear analysis, are also discussed.  It can easily be shown that every popular linear analysis can be derived from understanding MCRA.  
    </abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://www.tqmp.org/Content/vol04-2/p065/p065.pdf</fullTextUrl>

    <keywords language="eng">    
      <keyword>Stastitics</keyword>

      <keyword>General linear model</keyword>




    </keywords>
  </record>


</records>

