<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO8859-1"?>
<records>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>TQMP</publisher>
    <journalTitle>Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology</journalTitle>
    <issn>1913-4126</issn>
    <publicationDate>2011-04-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>7</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <startPage>1</startPage>
    <endPage>4</endPage>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Non-central t distribution and the power of the t test: A rejoinder</title>

    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Denis Cousineau</name>
        <email>denis.cousineau@umontreal.ca</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>

      <author>
        <name>Louis Laurencelle</name>
        <email>louis.laurencelle@uqtr.ca</email>
        <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
      </author>




    </authors>

    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Université de Montréal</affiliationName>

      <affiliationName affiliationId="2">Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières</affiliationName>




    </affiliationsList>

    <abstract language="eng">
       Non-central t distribution needed for assessing the power of the t test is described. Three approximations are compared and their merits discussed in regard to simplicity and accuracy.  
    </abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://www.tqmp.org/Content/vol07-1/p001/p001.pdf</fullTextUrl>

    <keywords language="eng">    
      <keyword>Statistical power</keyword>

      <keyword>t test</keyword>


      <keyword>Noncentral t distribution</keyword>



    </keywords>
  </record>

  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>TQMP</publisher>
    <journalTitle>Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology</journalTitle>
    <issn>1913-4126</issn>
    <publicationDate>2011-04-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>7</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <startPage>5</startPage>
    <endPage>14</endPage>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Correspondence Analysis applied to psychological research</title>

    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Laura Doey</name>
        <email>laurah6@hotmail.com</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>

      <author>
        <name>Jessica Kurta</name>
        <email>jkurt060@uottawa.ca</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>




    </authors>

    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">University of Ottawa</affiliationName>




    </affiliationsList>

    <abstract language="eng">
       Correspondence analysis  is an exploratory data technique used to analyze categorical data  (Benzecri,  1992).  It  is  used  in  many  areas  such  as  marketing  and  ecology. Correspondence analysis has been used  less often  in psychological research, although it can be suitably applied. This article discusses  the benefits of using correspondence analysis  in  psychological  research  and  provides  a  tutorial  on  how  to  perform correspondence analysis using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).  
    </abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://www.tqmp.org/Content/vol07-1/p005/p005.pdf</fullTextUrl>

    <keywords language="eng">    
      <keyword>Correspondence analysis</keyword>

      <keyword>statistics</keyword>




    </keywords>
  </record>

  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>TQMP</publisher>
    <journalTitle>Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology</journalTitle>
    <issn>1913-4126</issn>
    <publicationDate>2011-04-01</publicationDate>
    <volume>7</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <startPage>15</startPage>
    <endPage>18</endPage>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Randomization test of mean is compuationally inaccessible when the number of groups exceeds two</title>

    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Denis Cousineau</name>
        <email>denis.cousineau@umontreal.ca</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>




    </authors>

    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Université de Montréal</affiliationName>




    </affiliationsList>

    <abstract language="eng">
       With  the  advent  of  fast  computers,  the  randomization  test  of mean  (also  called  the permutation  test)  received some attention  in  the  recent years. Here we show  that  the 
randomization  test  is  possible  only  for  two-group  design;  comparing  three  groups requires a number of permutations so vast that even three groups of ten participants is beyond the current capabilities of modern computers. Further, we show that the rate of increase  in  the  number  of  permutation  is  so  large  that  simply  adding  one  more participant per group  to  the data  results  in a  computation  time  increased by at  least one  order  of magnitude  (in  the  three-group  design)  or more. Hence,  the  exhaustive randomization test may never be a viable alternative to ANOVAs.  
    </abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://www.tqmp.org/Content/vol07-1/p015/p015.pdf</fullTextUrl>

    <keywords language="eng">    
      <keyword>Randomization test</keyword>

      <keyword>statistics</keyword>




    </keywords>
  </record>


</records>

