top banner top banner
index
RegularArticles
ReplicationStudies
EditorialBoard
Instructions4Authors
JournalGuidelines
Messages
Submission

Search publications

Impact of simple substitution methods for missing data on Classical test theory difficulty and discrimination

Full text PDF
Bibliographic information: BibTEX format RIS format XML format APA style
Cited references information: BibTEX format APA style
Doi: 10.20982/tqmp.14.3.p180

Béland, Sébastien , Jolani, Shahab , Pichette, Fran{\c {c}}ois , Renaud, Jean-Sébastien
180-192
Keywords: Classical test theory , item difficulty , item discrimination , missing data at random , educational testing
Tools: R
(no sample data)   (no appendix)

In Classical test theory, difficulty ($p$) and discrimination ($d$) are two item coefficients that are widely used to analyze and validate items in educational testing. However, test items are usually affected by missing data (MD), and little is known about the effect of methods for handling MD on these two coefficients. The current study compares several simple substitution (imputation) strategies for dichotomous items to better understand their impact on item difficulty and discrimination. We conducted a simulation study, followed by the analysis of a real data set of test items from a language test. Based on the root mean square errors (RMSE), person mean (PM) is the best overall replacement method for difficulty $p$ and discrimination $d$. However, the analysis of bias coefficients and the analysis of real data show many similarities between most of the methods investigated to compute $p$ while multiple imputation (MI) and complete cases (CC) seem to be the least biased methods to compute $d$.


Pages © TQMP;
Template last modified: 2018-10-16.
Page consulted on .
Be informed of the upcoming issues with RSS feed: RSS icon RSS