<record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>TQMP</publisher>
    <journalTitle>The Quantitative Methods for Psychology</journalTitle>
    <eissn>1913-4126</eissn>
    <publicationDate>2018-12-23</publicationDate>
    <volume>14</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <startPage>235</startPage>
    <endPage>241</endPage>
	<doi>10.20982/tqmp.14.4.p235</doi>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Quelle sorte de majorité, ou comment déterminer les lauréats d'un concours? </title>

    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Laurencelle, Louis</name>
        <email>louis.laurencelle@gmail.com</email>
        <affiliationId>a</affiliationId>
      </author>
    </authors>

    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada</affiliationName>
    </affiliationsList>

    <abstract language="eng">
       Determining the final ranking of a set of candidates individually classified by two or more judges is carried out using different proposed rules, each rule giving a somewhat original and sometimes paradoxical result. The known calculation rules are defined, exemplified and analyzed, as well as some new ones. Finally, pragmatic suggestions to help obtain a satisfying outcome are given.  
    </abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://www.tqmp.org/RegularArticles/vol14-4/p235/p235.pdf</fullTextUrl>

    <keywords language="eng">    
      <keyword>Majority calculation</keyword>
      <keyword>Condorcet's paradox</keyword>
      <keyword>rank pooling rules</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>