Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 19, 716-723.

Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 78–102. 

Bandalos, D. L. (2008). Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology.  Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 211–240. 

Cao, C., & Liang, X.  (2022) The impact of model size on the sensitivity of fit measures in measurement invariance testing. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29, 744-754.

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. 

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2001). The effects of model parsimony and sampling error on the fit of structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods: A multidisciplinary Journal, 4, 236–264.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Glanville, J. L., & Wildhagen, T. (2007). The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 1019-1041.  

Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Singer Foust, M. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 233–256. 

Hau, K. T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57, 327–351. 

Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 333–351.

Kim, E. S., Yoon, M., & Lee, T. (2012). Testing measurement invariance using MIMIC: Likelihood ratio test with a critical value adjustment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 469–492.

Kim, S.-H., Cohen, A. S., Cho, S.-J., & Eom, H. J. (2019). Use of information criteria in the study of group differences in trace lines. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43, 95–112

Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J., & Tesluk, P. E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 186–207. 

Lee, J., & Whittaker, T. (2021). The impact of item parceling on structural parameters invariance in multi-group structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 684-698. 

Leemis, L. M., & Trivedi, K. S. (1996). A comparison of approximate interval estimators for the Bernoulli parameter. The American Statistician, 50(1), 63-68.

Liang, X., & Jacobucci, R. (2020). Regularized structural equation modeling to detect measurement bias: Evaluation of lasso, adaptive lasso, and elastic net. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 722-734. 

Liang, X., & Luo, Y. (2020). A comprehensive comparison of model selection models for testing factorial invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 380-395.

Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76.

Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 151–173. 

Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300. 

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indictors per factors in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33,181–222.

Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J., & Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right—camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18, 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0032773  

Meade, A. W., & Kroustalis, C. M. (2006). Problems with item parceling for confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 369–403. 

Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A Monte-Carlo study of confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement equivalence/invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 60 –72.

Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and Sensitivity of Alternative Fit indices in Tests of Measurement Invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568-592.

Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. 

Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2021). Mplus user’s guild (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Nasser, F., & Wisenbaker, J. (2003). A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 729–757. 

Rogers, W. M., & Schmitt, N. (2004). Parameter recovery and model fit using multidimensional composites: A comparison of four empirical parceling algorithms. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 379–412. 

Schlotz W., Yim I..S., Zoccola, P. M. , Jansen, L., & Schulz, P. (2011). The Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale: measurement invariance, stability, and validity in three countries. Psychol Assess. 23, 80-94.

Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.

Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criterion to some problems in multivariate

Shi, D., Song, H., DiStefano, C., Maydeu-Olivares, A., McDaniel, H. L., & Jiang, Z. (2019). Evaluating factorial invariance: An interval estimation approach using Bayesian structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54(2), 224-245. 

Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2006). Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1292–1306.

Sterba, S. K. (2011). Implications of parcel-allocation variability for comparing fit of item-solutions and parcel-solutions. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 554–577. 
Sterba, S. K., & MacCallum, R. C. (2010). Variability in parameter estimates and model fit across repeated allocations of items to parcels. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 322–358. 

Vrieze, S. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory:A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion(AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17, 228–243. 

Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281– 324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Associationanalysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333-343.