Bamber, D. (1969). Reaction times and error rates for “Same” and “Different” judgments of multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 6(3), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210087

Bamber, D. (1972). Reaction times and error rates for judging nominal identity of letter strings. Perception & Psychophysics, 12(4), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207214

Cousineau, D., Goulet, M.-A., & Harding, B. (2021). Summary plots with adjusted error bars: The superb framework with an implementation in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(3), Article 25152459211035109. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211035109

Cousineau, D., Harding, B., Walker, J. A., Durand, G., T.-Groulx, J., Lauzon, S., & Goulet, M.-A. (2023). Analyses of response time data in the same–different task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 77(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000301

Goulet, M. A., & Cousineau, D. (2019). The power of replicated measures to increase statistical power. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919849434 

Goulet, M.-A., & Cousineau, D. (2020). Sequential sampling models of same-different data and how they explain the fast-same effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 74(4), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000197

Harding, B., & Cousineau, D. (2022). Is the fast-same phenomenon that fast? An investigation of identity priming in the same–different task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(4), 520–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001076

Harding, B., Tremblay, C., Cousineau, D. (2014). Standard errors: A review and evaluation of standard error estimators using Monte Carlo simulations. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 10(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.10.2.p107  

Heitz, R. P. (2014). The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8(150), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00150 

Henmon V. A. C. (1911). The relation of the time of a judgment to its accuracy. Psychological Review Review, 18, 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074579  

Huber, D. E. (2008). Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.324 

Krueger, L. E. (1978). A theory of perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 85(4), 278–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.4.278

Nickerson, R. S. (1976). Short-term retention of visually presented stimuli: Some evidence of visual encoding. Acta Psychologica, 40, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(76)90010-5 

Proctor, R. W. (1981). A unified theory for matching-task phenomena. Psychological Review, 88(4), 291–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.291 

Proctor, R. W. (1986). Response bias, criteria settings, and the fast-same phenomenon: A reply to Ratcliff. Psychological Review, 93(4), 473–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.4.473

Proctor, R. W., & Rao, K. V. (1982). On the “misguided” use of reaction-time differences: A discussion of Ratcliff and Hacker (1981). Perception & Psychophysics, 31(6), 601–604. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204200

Proctor, R. W., & Rao, K. V. (1983a). Evidence that the same-different disparity in letter matching is not attributable to response bias. Perception & Psychophysics, 34(1), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205898

Proctor, R. W., Rao, K. V., & Hurst, P. W. (1984). An examination of response bias in multiletter matching. Perception & Psychophysics, 35(5), 464–476. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203923

Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59

Ratcliff, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 88(6), 552–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.6.552 

Ratcliff, R. (1985). Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. Psychological Review, 92(2), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.2.212

Ratcliff, R., & Hacker, M. J. (1981). Speed and accuracy of same and different responses in perceptual matching. Perception & Psychophysics, 30(3), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214286

Ratcliff, R., & Hacker, M. J. (1983). On the misguided use of reaction-time differences: A reply to Proctor & Rao (1982). Perception & Psychophysics, 31(6), 603–604. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204201

Smith, P. L., & Little, D. R. (2018). Small is beautiful: In defense of the small-N design. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25, 2083-2101. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1451-8 

Taylor, D. A. (1976). Effect of identity in the multiletter matching task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(3), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.2.3.417 

Wagenmakers, E. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2007). An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194023