|
An Equivalence Testing Approach for Evaluating Substantial Mediation
Full text PDF
Bibliographic information:
BibTEX format
RIS format
XML format
APA style
Cited references information:
BibTEX format
APA style
Doi:
10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p424
Beribisky, Nataly
, Mara, Constance A.
, Cribbie, Robert A.
424-441
Keywords:
Mediation
, equivalence testing
, substantial mediation
(no sample data)
 
(no appendix)
In the past, researchers often used the nonsignificance of the direct path from the predictor to the outcome, in conjunction with a significant indirect effect, to make claims regarding "full mediation". However, the nil hypothesis (i.e., full mediation) is not realistic and it is well known that a nonsignificant test statistic cannot be used to establish the accuracy of a research hypothesis. In this paper, we discuss equivalence testing based procedures for assessing when a mediator explains a substantial proportion of the relationship between a predictor and an outcome. Monte Carlo simulations are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed procedure and compare it against competing alternatives, including traditional tests of full mediation and a proportion mediated approach. The proposed equivalence testing based procedures and the proportion mediated approach performed similarly across the conditions investigated. Recommendations are provided for deciding among the approaches.
|