top banner top banner
index
RegularArticles
ReplicationStudies
SpecialIssues
Vignettes
EditorialBoard
Instructions4Authors
JournalGuidelines
Messages
Submission

Search publications

How can musicians be both more and less empathic than nonmusicians? Using R and Shiny to reveal how Simpson's Paradox emerges when comparing unbalanced groups

Full text PDF
Bibliographic information: BibTEX format RIS format XML format APA style
Cited references information: BibTEX format APA style
Doi: 10.20982/tqmp.20.3.v004

van Vugt, Floris
v4-v10
Keywords: Put keywords here , in a comma separated list
Tools: R, Shiny
(no sample data)   (no appendix)

Imagine we want to understand whether musicians are more empathic than non-musicians. We recruit two groups of individuals, musicians and nonmusicians, and administer empathy tests. To compare the empathy scores we could use a two-sample t-test, or, equivalently, a one-way ANOVA. However, before we do so, textbooks advise us we have to investigate whether the two groups are balanced when it comes to other variables, such as age and sex. Why is that important? Students may feel that this is merely a bureaucratic step, a formality of sorts. In this teaching vignette, we explore how group imbalances may affect the conclusions we draw from the dataset. We provide sample datasets as well as an online interactive interface that allows the students to explore when group imbalances are problematic and when they are not. We explore ways to test group imbalances and ways to deal with them, such as including the confounding variables into the analysis model. Overall, the learning activity aims to help sensitize students to the problem of unaccounted group imbalances.


Pages © TQMP;
Website last modified: 2024-11-30.
Template last modified: 2022-03-04 18h27.
Page consulted on .
Be informed of the upcoming issues with RSS feed: RSS icon RSS