top banner top banner
index
RegularArticles
ReplicationStudies
Vignettes
EditorialBoard
Instructions4Authors
JournalGuidelines
Messages
Submission

Search publications

When accuracy rates and mean response times lead to false conclusions: A simulation study based on the diffusion model

Full text PDF
Bibliographic information: BibTEX format RIS format XML format APA style
Cited references information: BibTEX format APA style
Doi: 10.20982/tqmp.16.2.p107

Lerche, Veronika , Voss, Andreas
107-119
Keywords: diffusion model , validity , mathematical models , reaction time methods
Tools: fast-dm
(no sample data)   (no appendix)

The diffusion model belongs to the class of sequential sampling models. Based on information about RT distributions from binary tasks, the model allows the separation of distinct processes underlying decision-making. With the present simulation study, we demonstrate that diffusion modeling has essential advantages over the mere analysis of behavioral variables such as accuracy rate or mean RT. Specifically, our results show that qualitatively different sets of diffusion model parameters can lead to the same pattern of these aggregated variables, which renders the interpretation of these measures ambiguous. Even apparently clear patterns of results can be based on completely different parameter sets, which reflect completely different cognitive processes. For example, if one group\IeC {\textquoteright }s performance (or performance in one experimental condition) is superior in both mean RT and accuracy rate (i.e., fast responses and few errors), this does not necessarily mean that in this group (or condition) information processing is faster (drift rate of the diffusion model). Accordingly, we conclude that the mere analysis of behavioral variables can result in false conclusions.


Pages © TQMP;
Website last modified: 2020-05-28.
Template last modified: 2019-03-03>.
Page consulted on .
Be informed of the upcoming issues with RSS feed: RSS icon RSS