
Effects of violating the assumptions of equal variance and independent and identically distributed random variables: A case using Bayesian statistical modeling
Full text PDF
Bibliographic information:
BibTEX format
RIS format
XML format
APA style
Cited references information:
BibTEX format
APA style
Doi:
10.20982/tqmp.19.3.p281
Sawada, Tadamasa
281295
Keywords:
Bayesian statistics
, Bayesian modeling
, Type1 error
, Unequal variance
, Statistical literacy
, Independent and identically distributed random variables
Tools: R
(data file)
(Appendix)
All statistical methods involve assumptions about the data and the output of the methods can be biased when the assumptions are not supported by the data. One of the common assumptions is equal variance across the conditions. Another common assumption is that variables are independently sampled from identically distributed populations (i.i.d.). The present study describes an example of such a violation of these assumptions and its effect on the results of Bayesian statistical analyses. Yu et al. (2021) developed a Bayesian statistical model that can analyze the same type of data as the oneway repeatedmeasure ANOVA. Their model assumed equal variance and i.i.d. Unfortunately, these assumptions were not satisfied by their data. In the present study, their model was revised to allow variance to vary with the conditions, and their data was reanalyzed. The results of the analyses using these models were compared with the psychophysical results of Yu et al. (2021). This comparison showed that the violated assumptions biased the results of the analysis. This bias made the results of the analysis appear more supportive of Yu et al.’s (2021) conclusion, but the validity of the analysis’s results needs to be reconsidered. Note that it is important that one carefully scrutinizes the data and understands the statistical method used to discuss the results of the analysis.
